Can methods applied in medicine be used to summarize and disseminate conservation research?

作者：Ioan Fazey, JANET G. SALISBURY, David B. Lindenmayer, John H. Maindonald, Robert Douglas · 发表于：Environmental Conservation · 年份：2004 · DOI：10.1017/s0376892904001560 · 被引用次数：93 · 研究领域：Climate Change and Health Impacts、Economic and Environmental Valuation、Environmental and Social Impact Assessments

To ensure that the best scientific evidence is available to guide conservation action, effective mechanisms for communicating the results of research are necessary. In medicine, an evidence-based approach assists doctors in applying scientific evidence when treating patients. The approach has required the development of new methods for systematically reviewing research, and has led to the establishment of independent organizations to disseminate the conclusions of reviews. (1) Such methods could help bridge gaps between researchers and practitioners of environmental conservation. In medicine, systematic reviews place strong emphasis on reviewing experimental clinical trials that meet strict standards. Although experimental studies are much less common in conservation, many of the components of systematic reviews that reduce the biases when identifying, selecting and appraising relevant studies could still be applied effectively. Other methods already applied in medicine for the review of non-experimental studies will therefore be required in conservation. (2) Using systematic reviews and an evidence-based approach will only be one tool of many to reduce uncertainty when making conservation-related decisions. Nevertheless an evidence-based approach does complement other approaches (for example adaptive management), and could facilitate the use of the best available research in environmental management. (3) In medicine, the Cochrane Collaboration was established as an independe...