Evaluation of Rapid Diagnostic Tests for Typhoid Fever

作者：Sonja J. Olsen, Jim Pruckler, W F Bibb, Nguyen Thi My Thanh, Tran My Trinh, Nguyen Thi Minh, Sumathi Sivapalasingam, Amita Gupta, Phan Thu Phuong, Nguyen Tran Chinh, Nguyen VV Chau, Phung Dac Cam, Eric D. Mintz · 发表于：Journal of Clinical Microbiology · 年份：2004 · DOI：10.1128/jcm.42.5.1885-1889.2004 · 被引用次数：206 · 研究领域：Salmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology、Viral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology、Vibrio bacteria research studies

Laboratory diagnosis of typhoid fever requires isolation and identification of Salmonella enterica serotype Typhi. In many areas where this disease is endemic, laboratory capability is limited. Recent advances in molecular immunology have led to the identification of sensitive and specific markers for typhoid fever and technology to manufacture practical and inexpensive kits for their rapid detection. We evaluated three commercial kits for serologic diagnosis of typhoid fever. Patients presenting with > or = 4 days of fever were enrolled at two hospitals in Southern Vietnam. Cases were patients with serotype Typhi isolated from blood samples, and controls were patients with other laboratory-confirmed illnesses. Serotype Typhi isolates were confirmed and tested for antimicrobial susceptibility at the Pasteur Institute in Ho Chi Minh City. The Widal test was run at the hospitals and the Pasteur Institute. Sera were shipped frozen to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and tested by using Multi-Test Dip-S-Ticks, TyphiDot, and TUBEX to detect immunoglobulin G (IgG), IgG and IgM, and IgM, respectively. Package insert protocol instructions were followed. We enrolled 59 patients and 21 controls. The sensitivity and specificity findings were as follows: 89 and 53% for Multi-Test Dip-S-Ticks, 79 and 89% for TyphiDot, 78 and 89% for TUBEX, and 64 and 76% for Widal testing in hospitals and 61% and 100% for Widal testing at the Pasteur Institute. For all assays, the sensitivit...