Scholay

学术搜索 · AI 审稿 · LaTeX 协作

The expert consensus guideline series: adherence problems in patients with serious and persistent mental illness.

作者:Dawn I. Velligan, Peter J. Weiden, Martha Sajatovic, J Scott, Daniel Carpenter, R. D. Ross, John P. Docherty · 发表于:PubMed · 年份:2009 · 被引用次数:611 · 研究领域:Medication Adherence and Compliance、Schizophrenia research and treatment、Bipolar Disorder and Treatment

OBJECTIVES: Poor adherence to medication treatment can have devastating consequences for patients with mental illness. The goal of this project was to develop recommendations for addressing adherence problems to improve patient outcomes. METHODS: The editors identified important topics and questions concerning medication adherence problems in serious mental illness that are not fully addressed in the literature. A survey was developed containing 39 questions (521 options) asking about defining nonadherence, extent of adherence problems in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder, risk factors for nonadherence, assessment methods, and interventions for specific types of adherence problems. The survey was completed by 41 (85%) of the 48 experts to whom it was sent. Results of the literature review and survey were used to develop recommendations for assessing and improving adherence in patients with serious mental illness. RESULTS: ASSESSING ADHERENCE: The experts endorsed percentage of medication not taken as the preferred method of defining adherence, with 80% or more of medication taken endorsed as an appropriate cut-off for adherence in bipolar disorder and schizophrenia. Although self- and physician report are the most common methods used to assess adherence in clinical settings, they are often inaccurate and may underestimate nonadherence. The experts recommend that, if possible, clinicians also use more objective measures (e.g., pill counts, pharmacy records, and, when appropri...