Five year experience in management of perforated peptic ulcer and validation of common mortality risk prediction models – Are existing models sufficient? A retrospective cohort study

作者：Kamalesh Anbalakan, Darren Yee Shuen Chua, Garvi Pandya, Vishal G. Shelat · 发表于：International Journal of Surgery · 年份：2015 · DOI：10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.12.022 · 被引用次数：99 · 研究领域：Helicobacter pylori-related gastroenterology studies、Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment、Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders

BACKGROUND: Emergency surgery for perforated peptic ulcer (PPU) is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Accurate and early risk stratification is important. The primary aim of this study is to validate the various existing MRPMs and secondary aim is to audit our experience of managing PPU. METHODS: 332 patients who underwent emergency surgery for PPU at a single intuition from January 2008 to December 2012 were studied. Clinical and operative details were collected. Four MRPMs: American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) score, Boey's score, Mannheim peritonitis index (MPI) and Peptic ulcer perforation (PULP) score were validated. RESULTS: Median age was 54.7 years (range 17-109 years) with male predominance (82.5%). 61.7% presented within 24 h of onset of abdominal pain. Median length of stay was 7 days (range 2-137 days). Intra-abdominal collection, leakage, re-operation and 30-day mortality rates were 8.1%, 2.1%, 1.2% and 7.2% respectively. All the four MRPMs predicted intra-abdominal collection and mortality; however, only MPI predicted leak (p = 0.01) and re-operation (p = 0.02) rates. The area under curve for predicting mortality was 75%, 72%, 77.2% and 75% for ASA score, Boey's score, MPI and PULP score respectively. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Emergency surgery for PPU has low morbidity and mortality in our experience. MPI is the only scoring system which predicts all - intra-abdominal collection, leak, reoperation and mortality. All four MRPMs had a simil...