Assessment of the contribution of the IHC4+C score to decision making in clinical practice in early breast cancer

作者：Sarah Barton, Lila Zabaglo, Roger A’Hern, Nicholas C. Turner, Thomas Ferguson, Suzanne C. O’Neill, Margaret Hills, Ian Smith, Mitch Dowsett · 发表于：British Journal of Cancer · 年份：2012 · DOI：10.1038/bjc.2012.166 · 被引用次数：67 · 研究领域：Breast Cancer Treatment Studies、HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research、Advanced Breast Cancer Therapies

BACKGROUND: The immunohistochemical (IHC) 4+C score is a cost-effective prognostic tool that uses clinicopathologic factors and four standard IHC assays: oestrogen receptor (ER), PR, HER2 and Ki67. We assessed its utility in personalising breast cancer treatment in a clinical practice setting, through comparison with Adjuvant! Online (AoL) and the Nottingham Prognostic Index (NPI). METHODS: We prospectively gathered clinicopathologic data for postmenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative, N0-3 resected early breast cancer treated consecutively at our institution. We retrospectively calculated and compared prognostic scores. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients reclassified from AoL-defined intermediate-risk by application of the IHC4+C score. RESULTS: The median age of the 101 patients included in the analysis was 63. In all, 15 of the 26 patients classified as intermediate-risk by AoL were reallocated to a low-risk group by application of the IHC4+C score and no patient was reclassified as high-risk group. Of the 59 patients classified as intermediate-risk group by the NPI, 24 were reallocated to a low-risk group and 13 to a high-risk group. CONCLUSION: IHC4+C reclassifies more than half of the patients stratified as being in intermediate-risk group by the AoL and NPI. The use of IHC4+C may substantially improve decision-making on adjuvant chemotherapy.