Scholay

学术搜索 · AI 审稿 · LaTeX 协作

Evaluation of the BAX system for detection of Listeria monocytogenes in foods: collaborative study.

作者:Karen M Silbernagel, Robert P. Jechorek, W. Mark Barbour, Peter Mrozinski, W Alejo, V Aleo, Bridget Andaloro, F Beacorn, Joe Benzinger, S Bogar, C Brayman, J. Broom, M Carson, Charles N Carver, Changyong Cheng, Bill Centrella, J Clayborn, C.H. Collins, Christina Deibel, M Divine, S Eliasberg, Doris Farmer, Stephan A. Frye, T Gatesy, E Goodstein, C Halker, G Hall, P Hanson, G Hartman, K Heddaeus, John H. Hembree, J Hutchins, Philip F Istafanos, R. P. Jechorek, John A. Jenkins, Khalil Kerdahi, Stefanie Kremer, Archana Lal, S. Leighton, David S. Lester, J. Lewis, Jun‐Fang Lin, José Guilherme Prado Martin, M Maselli, PATRICIA A. McCARTHY, Barbara McGovern, Michael R. Mills, F Mohnke, Bokyung Moon, Diana L. Moss, María L. Plaza, Sharon Robeson, H Romero, D Rubalcaba, Ann Schultz, J Seehusen, Christopher Shaw, K Siem, E Sloan, J Stanerson, Надія Володимирівна Степанова, Khanh Van, K Van Enkenvoort, Monica Vialpando, W. L. Warren, Karen Watts, K Wilson, T. Woodruff · 发表于:PubMed · 年份:2004 · 被引用次数:18 · 研究领域:Listeria monocytogenes in Food Safety、Food Safety and Hygiene、Identification and Quantification in Food

A multilaboratory study was conducted to compare the automated BAX system and the standard cultural methods for detection of Listeria monocytogenes in foods. Six food types (frankfurters, soft cheese, smoked salmon, raw, ground beef, fresh radishes, and frozen peas) were analyzed by each method. For each food type, 3 inoculation levels were tested: high (average of 2 CFU/g), low (average of 0.2 CFU/g) and uninoculated controls. A total of 25 laboratories representing government and industry participated. Of the 2335 samples analyzed, 1109 were positive by the BAX system and 1115 were positive by the standard method. A Chi square analysis of each of the 6 food types, at the 3 inoculation levels tested, was performed. For all foods, except radishes, the BAX system performed as well as or better than the standard reference methods based on the Chi square results.